Tzaddi is not the Star

Q&A and discussion on the Hermetic Qabbalah

Moderator: Moderators - Public

Re: Tzaddi is not the Star

Postby Hermitas » Wed Dec 31, 2014 6:12 am

Found it. From the Zohar.
26. Subsequently, the letter Tzadik appeared before the Creator and said: “Master of the world, You should create the world with me, for Tzadikim (the righteous) are marked by me. You, who is called a Tzadik (righteous one), are also recorded within me, for You are righteous and You love righteousness. Therefore, my properties are suitable to create the world by.”

The Creator answered: “Tzadik, you are truly righteous, but you must remain concealed and not be revealed to the extent required were the world to be created by you, so as to not give the world an excuse.” The concealment of the letter Tzadik is necessary, for first came the letter Nun, which was then joined by the letter Yod from the Creator’s Holy Name Yod-Hey-Vav-Hey (HaVaYaH), who stood above it as a mark of the bond between the Creator and His creations, mounted the letter Nun and joined it on its right hand side, thereby creating the letter Tzadik.


It's... not as suggestive as I thought it was, but somebody tried to make the point once, and it stuck with me.
User avatar
Hermitas
Nothing
Nothing
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:49 am

Re: Tzaddi is not the Star

Postby Jim Eshelman » Wed Dec 31, 2014 6:35 am

Aion, are you sure you aren't thinking of the same remark about Tzaddiy?

Or maybe the paragraph on Heh in 32vPaths of Wisdom? I'm not remembering quote but recall tone as similar.
Love is the law, love under will.
Yours in L.V.X.,
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com
"Success is thy proof: argue not; convert not; talk not overmuch!" - CCXX 3:42
User avatar
Jim Eshelman
Lost His Marbles
 
Posts: 9577
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 1:41 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Tzaddi is not the Star

Postby Jim Eshelman » Wed Dec 31, 2014 7:06 am

Aion, now that I'm not commuting and can look something up... I wonder if you were remembering the tone (more than the specific language) of the paragraph on Hé from The 32 Paths of Wisdom. It translates as follows:

32PW on H wrote:The Fifteenth Path is called the Constituting Consciousness, because it constitutes the Substance of Creation in pure darkness. According to masters of contemplation, this is that darkness referred to in Scripture, “and thick darkness its swaddling band.”

The phrase I translated “pure darkness” is arafeley tahor. Kaplan, who translated it “Glooms of Purity,” remarked that this expression is found in the Musaf service for Rash Hashanah at the beginning of Shofrot, relating to the revelation at Sinai. Arafeley comes from a similar word meaning “the darkness of clouds” or “thick clouds;” hence Kaplan’s “gloom.” Tahor, “pure” (=220), is the name the mode of consciousness attributed to Y’sod.

"Masters of contemplation" likely means those that have mastered dhyana, and certainly no one without this capacity is likely to be able to perceive the condition described.

The closing phrase. “thick darkness its swaddling band,” is a direct quote from Job 38:9, va-arafel ḥathoollatho.
Love is the law, love under will.
Yours in L.V.X.,
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com
"Success is thy proof: argue not; convert not; talk not overmuch!" - CCXX 3:42
User avatar
Jim Eshelman
Lost His Marbles
 
Posts: 9577
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 1:41 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Tzaddi is not the Star

Postby Hermitas » Wed Dec 31, 2014 7:35 am

Jim Eshelman wrote:Aion, are you sure you aren't thinking of the same remark about Tzaddiy?

I'm not sure why that version I cut and pasted uses "Tzadik" with the k on the end. But, yes, I'm referring to the letter.

Thanks for the quote from 32 Paths of Wisdom as well.
User avatar
Hermitas
Nothing
Nothing
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:49 am

Re: Tzaddi is not the Star

Postby Jim Eshelman » Wed Dec 31, 2014 7:38 am

I wasn't worried about the K. You said you were looking for a quote on Hé being hidden, and I was asking if maybe you meant the passage I referenced about Tzaddiy being hidden (from the Zohar, in the story of how Alef got to be the first letter of the alphabet).
Love is the law, love under will.
Yours in L.V.X.,
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com
"Success is thy proof: argue not; convert not; talk not overmuch!" - CCXX 3:42
User avatar
Jim Eshelman
Lost His Marbles
 
Posts: 9577
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 1:41 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Tzaddi is not the Star

Postby Hermitas » Wed Dec 31, 2014 11:03 am

Jim Eshelman wrote:Aion, are you sure you aren't thinking of the same remark about Tzaddiy?

Yes, that's the one. I think maybe you missed where I quoted it above your post. It's the first post after the page break, so.. Unless I'm completely missing your intent.
User avatar
Hermitas
Nothing
Nothing
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:49 am

Re: Tzaddi is not the Star

Postby Coagvla » Fri Apr 17, 2015 3:46 am

My twobits for what it's worth, the line 'double loop of the zodiac' bent my mind for many years. Many times I
have yelled at my BoT 'but it only loops once!!!!'....but Jim is right of course

Sent from my KFSOWI using Tapatalk
User avatar
Coagvla
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 2:51 am
Location: Australia

Re: Tzaddi is not the Star

Postby Jim Eshelman » Fri Apr 17, 2015 4:30 am

I am fascinated that this thread has had over 80,000 views!
Love is the law, love under will.
Yours in L.V.X.,
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com
"Success is thy proof: argue not; convert not; talk not overmuch!" - CCXX 3:42
User avatar
Jim Eshelman
Lost His Marbles
 
Posts: 9577
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 1:41 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Tzaddi is not the Star

Postby Takamba » Fri Apr 17, 2015 10:49 am

Jim Eshelman wrote:I am fascinated that this thread has had over 80,000 views!

I imagine the subject matter is quite a search-bot magnet. It's also quite a long thread, which means many of us have viewed it again and again and again. :) I see it as 80,666 views. :twisted:
"If we are to have Beauty and Love, whether in begetting children or works of art, or what not, we must have perfect freedom to act, without fear or shame or any falsity."
User avatar
Takamba
Nothing
Nothing
 
Posts: 1320
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 1:19 pm

Re: Tzaddi is not the Star

Postby Hermitas » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:25 pm

It was just all me reading it over and over again to figure out where I missed Jim at the end.

Yes, Jim, apparently I said the one and meant the other. Sorry. I hate when I do that. Sometimes I could just fill myself.

<G>
User avatar
Hermitas
Nothing
Nothing
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:49 am

Re: Tzaddi is not the Star

Postby Knowledge + Delight » Thu Apr 21, 2016 6:48 pm

93

Sorry to bump this behemoth back into life, .... but I've been digging into this whole mess lately, and would like to take a stab at summarizing this in as clear a manner as possible (and to verify I have this correct in the first place!)

1: Prior to the Golden Dawn, the generally accepted trump order was that of Eliphas Levi (I won't bother detailing the earlier arrangements), which has the curious quirk of placing '0 - the Fool' between XX and XXI,

To make it quite clear to initiates that they did not understand the meaning of the card called The Fool, they put him down between Atu cards XX and XXI, for what reason it baffles the human imagination to conceive. They then attributed the card number I, the Juggler, to the letter Aleph. In this simple yet ingenious manner they got the attribution of every card, except The Universe, XXI, wrong.
-- Crowley


2: Golden Dawn makes two key changes; '0 - the Fool' is promoted to the first of the trumps, advancing all other cards by one letter (which also brings the letter=zodiac attributions in line with the Sepher Yetzirah), and 2: Mathers swaps the ATU images around for Strength (Fortitude) and Justice to 'fix' their images with the zodiac, which pretty clearly depict Leo/Libra. The Roman numbering is preserved by natural order of the cards.

3: "Tzaddi is not the Star", and here we are. Crowley swaps the Emperor & the Star cards, keeping the roman numbers IV & XVII attached to them, and additionally 'restores' the original numerals of Justice as VIII and Strength as XI (his reasoning undoubtedly reinforced by his Qabalistic interpretations of these numbers). It is this arrangement of the 'original' roman numerals, when the zodiac cards are ordered by their hebrew letters, which gives rise to the infamous 'double loop' pattern.

It should be noted though how this change was made, for Crowley has not moved the hebrew letters around for the Tzaddi switch - as HEH remains on path 15 and TZADDI on path 28 - but he has swapped all the other attributes of the Tarot cards: the ATU, roman numeral, and associated zodiac sign. In switching the zodiac signs with his change to IV & XVII, however, he has broken with the Sepher Yetzirah attribution of TZADDI=Aquarius and HE=Aries, and created a one-sided 'loop' in the zodiac.


Situation sound about right?

This is most clearly illustrated as a whole; (see attached image);
center -> out: path#, hebrew letter, zodiac, atu, roman numeral
Attachments
ThothTarotTrumps.png
ThothTarotTrumps.png (398.22 KiB) Viewed 3251 times
User avatar
Knowledge + Delight
Copper Member
Copper Member
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 9:53 am

Previous

Return to Qabbalah

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests